2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:anor.0000045283.86576.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Dynamic Programming Formulation for a Wastewater Treatment Decision-Making Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In several levels, the MAD values are quite high. We surmize that these levels require more discretization points to ensure a good MARS model, e.g., Tsai et al 9 utilized 12 167 discretization points. However, to reduce the computation needed to conduct the comparisons in the section, we chose to employ only 2209 discretization points.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In several levels, the MAD values are quite high. We surmize that these levels require more discretization points to ensure a good MARS model, e.g., Tsai et al 9 utilized 12 167 discretization points. However, to reduce the computation needed to conduct the comparisons in the section, we chose to employ only 2209 discretization points.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary objective function is to minimize economic cost, including capital and operating costs. More details of the decision-making framework within the wastewater treatment system can be found in Tsai et al 9 .…”
Section: Wastewater Treatment Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[21] studies several types of experimental designs for efficient state space discretization. This sampling scheme has been successfully used as a part of stochastic DP method to solve a high dimensional waste-water treatment planning problem [22].…”
Section: Pertinent Adp Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approximating the value function surface with a linear function is often a gross simplification. More complex approximation schemes like multivariate adaptive regression splines [22] or radial basis functions (RBF) destroy the guarantee for the convergence of the value function approximation. As a general rule, there is no guarantee of convergence for any of these methods using continuous value function approximations aside from some very special cases [28] where it is assumed that the policy is fixed.…”
Section: Pertinent Adp Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%