2021
DOI: 10.3390/math9243256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Dynamic Response Analysis of the 3D Slopes of Rockfill Dams Based on the Coupling Randomness of Strength Parameters and Seismic Ground Motion

Abstract: Because rockfill strength and seismic ground motion are dominant factors affecting the slope stability of rockfill dams, it is very important to accurately characterize the distribution of rockfill strength parameters, develop a stochastic ground motion model suitable for rockfill dam engineering, and effectively couple strength parameters and seismic ground motion to precisely evaluate the dynamic reliability of the three-dimensional (3D) slope stability of rockfill dams. In this study, a joint probability di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In copula theory, many copula functions are available [43] that can be employed to describe variable correlation structure types, but most types can only facilitate simulations within a limited range of correlation coefficient values [46], e.g., elliptic copula functions such as the Gaussian copula function and t copula function, the Plackett copula function, and Archimedean copula functions, such as the Frank, Clayton, CClayton, Gumble, No. 16 and No.…”
Section: Truncated Normal φmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In copula theory, many copula functions are available [43] that can be employed to describe variable correlation structure types, but most types can only facilitate simulations within a limited range of correlation coefficient values [46], e.g., elliptic copula functions such as the Gaussian copula function and t copula function, the Plackett copula function, and Archimedean copula functions, such as the Frank, Clayton, CClayton, Gumble, No. 16 and No.…”
Section: Truncated Normal φmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the seismic dynamic response of rock mass engineering mostly adopts the finite element method, finite difference method, finite volume method, boundary element method, etc. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. These numerical methods concentrate on the elastic-plastic analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%