2006
DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2006.12040642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Efficiency Measurement: The Curse of Theoretical Consistency

Abstract: The availability of efficiency estimation software -freely distributed via the internet and relatively easy to use -recently inflated the number of corresponding applications. The resulting efficiency estimates are used without a critical assessment with respect to the literature on theoretical consistency, flexibility and the choice of the appropriate functional form. The robustness of policy suggestions based on inferences from efficiency measures nevertheless crucially depends on theoretically well-founded … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
88
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in order to qualify as a well‐behaved model, the ISDF needs to be non‐decreasing in inputs and decreasing in outputs (Färe et al. , 1994; Sauer et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in order to qualify as a well‐behaved model, the ISDF needs to be non‐decreasing in inputs and decreasing in outputs (Färe et al. , 1994; Sauer et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…positive marginal products, with respect to all inputs and thus non‐negative production elasticities; and (ii) diminishing marginal productivity with respect to all inputs (i.e. the marginal products, apart from being positive should be decreasing in inputs) (Sauer et al. , 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the calculated value using the likelihood-ratio test is higher than the tabulated value, this hypothesis is rejected for all the four models at a 1% level of significance, implying that there are significant technical inefficiency effects in farm profit (Table 3). Sauer et al (2006) suggested to check for two different regularity conditions in the frontier model. These are: (a) monotonicity, i.e.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testing and Variance Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While estimating stochastic frontiers, it is important to check theoretical consistency, flexibility, and choice of the appropriate functional form (Sauer et al, 2006). Hereby, an alternative to the widely used Cobb-Douglas production function is the translog production function.…”
Section: Empirical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%