2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-03859-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic finite-fault ground motion simulation for the Mw 6.7 earthquake in Lushan, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model deviation obtained by the three path durations is nearly consistent with the recorded values; the maximum value of the model deviation in the whole period is no more than 0.41. This is consistent with the conclusion of Dang and Liu (2020), who simulated the 2013 Mw 6.7 Lushan, China earthquake and Dang et al (2021), who simulated the 2016 Mw 6.2 Tottori, Japan earthquake. Figure 14 shows In summary, in ground motion simulation, this study recommends using the source rise time determined in Equation 8 as the input parameter, which is consistent with the assumption used in deriving the static corner frequency, in theory, forming a unified whole, but also verified in the actual simulation.…”
Section: Effect Of Path Durationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The model deviation obtained by the three path durations is nearly consistent with the recorded values; the maximum value of the model deviation in the whole period is no more than 0.41. This is consistent with the conclusion of Dang and Liu (2020), who simulated the 2013 Mw 6.7 Lushan, China earthquake and Dang et al (2021), who simulated the 2016 Mw 6.2 Tottori, Japan earthquake. Figure 14 shows In summary, in ground motion simulation, this study recommends using the source rise time determined in Equation 8 as the input parameter, which is consistent with the assumption used in deriving the static corner frequency, in theory, forming a unified whole, but also verified in the actual simulation.…”
Section: Effect Of Path Durationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, if the dislocation of a subfault is extremely large, the subfault adjacent to it may be considerably small or even 0. Moreover, Dang and Liu (2020) used two different slip models to simulate the Lushan M w 6.7 earthquake; except for the different stress drop parameters, other input parameters were the same. The results indicated that the simulation method based on the two models provided the same results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results indicated that the simulation method based on the two models provided the same results. Some scholars have reported that random and inverted slip can only affect the simulation results at low frequencies and not at high frequencies (Dang & Liu, 2020; Fu & Li, 2017; Ghasemi et al., 2010). The results of the study comply with the observation values taken at most stations, especially at 65AKS, 65ALL, 65ALM, 65BRM, 65GDL, 65GLK, 65HLJ, 65HQC, 65JAS, 65SUF, 65SUL, 65YPH, and 65YPQ.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are several site amplification correction methods to account for this effect: (1) the empirical transfer function (ETF) method (Huang et al, 2017), which is formed by the deviation between regional weak events simulation and observation; (2) the HVSR method, which was proposed by Nakamura (1989), indicates that the site overburden has a significant impact on the horizontal component of ground motion, but has little effect on the vertical ground motion. This method was applied successfully in the site correction of stochastic simulation of the 2013 Lushan and 2016 Meinong earthquakes (Chen et al, 2017; Dang and Liu, 2020). In this study, the HVSR method was used to estimate the shallow site response.…”
Section: Simulation Of the 2021 Yangbi Earthquake With A Magnitude Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%