2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-012-9280-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic finite fault modelling of M w 4.8 earthquake in Kachchh, Gujarat, India

Abstract: The modified stochastic finite fault modelling technique based on dynamic corner frequency has been used to simulate the strong ground motions of M w 4.8 earthquake in the Kachchh region of Gujarat, India. The accelerograms have been simulated for 14 strong motion accelerographs sites (11 sites in Kachchh and three sites in Saurashtra) where the earthquake has been recorded. The region-specific source, attenuation and generic site parameters, which are derived from recordings of small to moderate earthquakes, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further weaken the influence of subfault size on the synthetic results, Boore (2009) proposed calculating the scaling factor based on the square of the acceleration spectrum, and Boore (2009) defined source rise time as the reciprocal of the static corner frequency f 0 ; however, Boore (2009) did not present a straightforward derivation process. The improved programs have been widely adopted worldwide for generating synthetic accelerograms for different engineering applications (Ameri et al., 2011; Chopra et al., 2012; Dang et al., 2022; Ghasemi et al., 2010; Ghofrani et al., 2013; Mittal & Kumar, 2015; Mittal et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2014; Sutar et al., 2020; Yalcinkaya et al., 2012; Zengin & Cakti, 2014). Compared with the point‐source modeling, finite fault modeling is advantageous as it simultaneously considers the geometry of the fault and the effect of rupture direction of the source; as a result, finite fault modeling can more accurately synthesize the near‐field ground motion of large earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further weaken the influence of subfault size on the synthetic results, Boore (2009) proposed calculating the scaling factor based on the square of the acceleration spectrum, and Boore (2009) defined source rise time as the reciprocal of the static corner frequency f 0 ; however, Boore (2009) did not present a straightforward derivation process. The improved programs have been widely adopted worldwide for generating synthetic accelerograms for different engineering applications (Ameri et al., 2011; Chopra et al., 2012; Dang et al., 2022; Ghasemi et al., 2010; Ghofrani et al., 2013; Mittal & Kumar, 2015; Mittal et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2014; Sutar et al., 2020; Yalcinkaya et al., 2012; Zengin & Cakti, 2014). Compared with the point‐source modeling, finite fault modeling is advantageous as it simultaneously considers the geometry of the fault and the effect of rupture direction of the source; as a result, finite fault modeling can more accurately synthesize the near‐field ground motion of large earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Boore (2003), the stochastic simulation method has been widely applied in practical engineering due to its simplicity and low number of input parameters. It has been proven to be the most effective technique for simulating ground motions, especially at a frequency of greater than 1 Hz (Chopra et al, 2012;RaghuKanth and Kavitha, 2013;Zafarani et al, 2015;Tanırcan and Yelkenci-Necmioğlu, 2020;Sutar et al, 2020;Sharma et al, 2021;Dang et al, 2021). Boore improved and modified the stochastic finite-fault approach, and thus, it was extensively used and followed by numerous scholars in simulating high-frequency ground motions (Boore and Thompson, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%