2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic identification of composite material properties from limited experimental databases, part I: Experimental database construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A common feature of most of these studies is the treatment of the primary uncertain parameters as random variables with assumed probabilistic characteristics. Experimental studies to investigate the appropriateness of the assumed probability distributions of the material parameters have been undertaken for different composite materials; see [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common feature of most of these studies is the treatment of the primary uncertain parameters as random variables with assumed probabilistic characteristics. Experimental studies to investigate the appropriateness of the assumed probability distributions of the material parameters have been undertaken for different composite materials; see [8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The material properties determined from standard specimens tested in the laboratory may deviate significantly from those of actual laminated composite components manufactured in a factory [12]. Composite structures exhibit variability and uncertainties in their material properties with relation to their compositions and manufacturing processes [13]. Operating conditions, quality control procedures, and environmental effects are often difficult to control, which affect the performance of composite structures [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This usually involves minimizing an error function between the experimental and numerical outputs [13]. Constructing of predictive computational models for analysis and design of many complex engineering systems requires not only a fine representation of the relevant physics and their interactions but also a quantitative assessment of underlying uncertainties and their impact on design performance objectives [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mehrez et al [14,15] accounts for both aleatory, i.e. the inherent uncertainty of the material proprieties from sample to sample, and epistemic uncertainties, related to lack of sufficient experimental data, using a Hermite Polynomial Chaos [5] expansion of the random variables on the identified Karhunen-Loeve (KL) series.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%