DOI: 10.4995/thesis/10251/12267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Inverse Methods to Identify non-Gaussian Model Parameters in Heterogeneous Aquifers

Abstract: Numerical modeling of groundwater flow and mass transport is increasingly becoming a reference criterion nowadays for water resources assessment and environmental protection. To render the model reliable for future predictions, the model structure and parameters have to be characterized as close to the reality as possible. The process of model identification by integrating measured parameters and observed model states is so called inverse problem. A series of methods has been proposed to solve the inverse prob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
(110 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the FAO global soil maps (or HWSD) rely on the China soil map for the Tibetan Plateau region, while their systematic soil correlations with the existing FAO soil classiication are not fully deined (FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC, 2008; Maria and Yost, 2006). An alternative is an inverse method (Li et al, 2012;Mohanty, 2013;Zhou, 2011). Kunstmann (2008) and Intsiful and Kunstmann (2008) previously applied a stochastic p. 2 of 9 inverse method to the estimation of several SVAT input parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the FAO global soil maps (or HWSD) rely on the China soil map for the Tibetan Plateau region, while their systematic soil correlations with the existing FAO soil classiication are not fully deined (FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC, 2008; Maria and Yost, 2006). An alternative is an inverse method (Li et al, 2012;Mohanty, 2013;Zhou, 2011). Kunstmann (2008) and Intsiful and Kunstmann (2008) previously applied a stochastic p. 2 of 9 inverse method to the estimation of several SVAT input parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%