2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c03711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Lag Time Parameterization for Markov State Models of Protein Dynamics

Abstract: Markov state models (MSMs) play a key role in studying protein conformational dynamics. A sliding count window with a fixed lag time is widely used to sample sub-trajectories for transition counting and MSM construction. However, subtrajectories sampled with a fixed lag time may not perform well under different selections of lag time, which requires strong prior practice and leads to less robust estimation. To alleviate it, we propose a novel stochastic method from a Poisson process to generate perturbative la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The projections on the PC1-PC2 coordinates were clustered into a number of microstates based on the k -centers clustering algorithm· For both Pt-PEG and Pt-PE, we took k = 300. Choice of lag time. Based on implied time scale analysis (Figures S3b and S4b), we chose 126 and 117.5 ps as the lag times to build MSMs for Pt-PEG and Pt-PE, respectively. The implied time scales for both systems reach plateaus after their lag times, indicating Markovian of the MSMs. Lumping and validation of MSMs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The projections on the PC1-PC2 coordinates were clustered into a number of microstates based on the k -centers clustering algorithm· For both Pt-PEG and Pt-PE, we took k = 300. Choice of lag time. Based on implied time scale analysis (Figures S3b and S4b), we chose 126 and 117.5 ps as the lag times to build MSMs for Pt-PEG and Pt-PE, respectively. The implied time scales for both systems reach plateaus after their lag times, indicating Markovian of the MSMs. Lumping and validation of MSMs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Choice of lag time. Based on implied time scale analysis 72 (Figures S3b and S4b), we chose 126 and 117.5 ps as the lag times to build MSMs for Pt-PEG and Pt-PE, respectively. The implied time scales for both systems reach plateaus after their lag times, indicating Markovian of the MSMs.…”
Section: Construction and Validation Of Markov State Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%