2006
DOI: 10.1109/led.2006.882524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Matching Properties of FinFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, to compare the sensitivity of regular and CSRAM cells to a different magnitude of mismatch [17], [18] in the nMOS andpMOS devices, some cells were simulated again. These new simulations included mismatch spreads scaled differently for the two transistor types, proving the different effects on cell yield that mismatches of pMOS and nMOS devices have.…”
Section: B Technology Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, to compare the sensitivity of regular and CSRAM cells to a different magnitude of mismatch [17], [18] in the nMOS andpMOS devices, some cells were simulated again. These new simulations included mismatch spreads scaled differently for the two transistor types, proving the different effects on cell yield that mismatches of pMOS and nMOS devices have.…”
Section: B Technology Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that in addition to a faster operation, CSRAM cells are more suitable for technologies that present a greater mismatch magnitude in the nMOS device than in the pMOS device, as in the case of the FinFETs presented in [17] or some of the devices in [18].…”
Section: Biased Mismatch Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WL-dependence is noticeably different from the mismatch in planar CMOS: in order to perform a linear regression across the data points, it is necessary to split the experimental σ's into two groups corresponding to devices with (1) the narrowest (W fin = 25 nm, dashed lines) fin width and (2) the larger fins (W fin ≥ 50 nm, plain lines). The improvement in both V T (2.3 and 1.8 mV/μm for n-and p-type FinFETs) and β (1.7 and 0.9% μm for n-and pFinFETs, respectively) mismatch in large devices has been attributed to the undoped nature of the fins and to the corresponding reduction of random dopant fluctuations [21]. On the other hand, it is believed that the degradation of the matching parameters for 25-nm fin widths is linked to enhanced sidewall roughness effects in the narrowest devices.…”
Section: Mismatch In Multiple-gate Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, series resistance fluctuations have been studied in case of advanced device architectures such as FinFET, where the access resistance of the source and drain terminals heavily impacted the mismatch behavior [54,55]. A similar effect can be observed in bulk MOS or, actually, in any other active device, when the whole deviceinterconnection system is affected by external (to the device) resistance fluctuations.…”
Section: Random Series Resistancementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Above threshold, however, the increase of the fluctuations is affected by series resistance fluctuations [54]. The currents delivered by these 1300-µm wide test devices are of the order of milliamperes even at low drain bias ( figure 4.2).…”
Section: Other Sources Of Mismatchmentioning
confidence: 98%