2019
DOI: 10.1109/tdsc.2017.2650901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Model Checking for Predicting Component Failures and Service Availability

Abstract: Abstract-When a component fails in a critical communications service, how urgent is a repair? If we repair within 1 hour, 2 hours, or n hours, how does this affect the likelihood of service failure? Can a formal model support assessing the impact, prioritisation, and scheduling of repairs in the event of component failures, and forecasting of maintenance costs? These are some of the questions posed to us by a large organisation and here we report on our experience of developing a stochastic framework based on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In qualitative analysis the DPLD of survival signature can be used to find scenarios of the system failure depending on the breakdown of one of components of a fixed type. These scenarios are used in the development of maintenance strategy of a complex system [2], [29], [41], [42]. In this paper, we consider only the influence of one component type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In qualitative analysis the DPLD of survival signature can be used to find scenarios of the system failure depending on the breakdown of one of components of a fixed type. These scenarios are used in the development of maintenance strategy of a complex system [2], [29], [41], [42]. In this paper, we consider only the influence of one component type.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some use expert knowledge and deductive reasoning processes. For example, there are works based on ontologies [21], on rules [22] or on models that try to link the physical processes of a system with mathematical models, such as Gaussian models [23], linear systems models [24] or Markov models [25].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper proposes a novel run-time verification framework to provide quantified trustworthiness for sensor-network-based systems, by combining data-driven [4] and model-driven [5] techniques. Model-driven techniques are typically used to provide an abstraction of a complex system, thus enabling the users to visualise, predict, optimise, regulate and control the system effectively [6]. All models are simplifications derived from a deep understanding of the system or a scientifically established relation between its components and the environment.…”
Section: Dynamic Probabilistic Model Checking For Sensor Validation Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calder et al [6] proposed a methodology for failure prediction of a critical communication system using a probability model. It defines three status categories for each component within the system, working, reduced-redundancy and noservice.…”
Section: Probabilistic Model Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%