2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2022.3179626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Multi-Dimensional Deconvolution

Abstract: Geophysical measurements such as seismic datasets contain valuable information that originate from areas of interest in the subsurface; these seismic reflections are however inevitably contaminated by other events created by waves reverberating in the overburden. Multi-Dimensional Deconvolution (MDD) is a powerful technique used at various stages of the seismic processing sequence to create ideal datasets deprived of such overburden effects. Whilst the underlying forward problem holds for a single source, a su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the solution improves when chained preconditioners are enforced across iterations (Table 1). Nevertheless, in all scenarios we observe a semi-convergence behavior (i.e., the solution starts to degrade after a certain number of iterations), highlighting the reliance of our method on a good stopping criterion (Ravasi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In general, the solution improves when chained preconditioners are enforced across iterations (Table 1). Nevertheless, in all scenarios we observe a semi-convergence behavior (i.e., the solution starts to degrade after a certain number of iterations), highlighting the reliance of our method on a good stopping criterion (Ravasi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…To validate our proposed procedure, the approach is first tested on a realistic synthetic data set contaminated by different types of noise. The data set has been modelled using a realistic synthetic velocity model that mimics the subsurface structure of the Volve field and an ocean‐bottom configuration (see Ravasi et al., 2022, for details). The noise types under investigation include white Gaussian noise (WGN), time‐correlated noise, both isotropic and anisotropic coloured Gaussian noise (CGN) and pseudo‐rig noise.…”
Section: Numerical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the original signal we are dealing with is the convolution of artificial pulse signals and real earthquake signals, which is why we need to perform wavelet decomposition. The process is similar to deconvolution, which can reverse the convolution process and extract the real earthquake pulse signals from the mixed seismic records and artificial pulse signals [33][34][35][36]. To understand the randomness in the signal, we use the median absolute deviation (MAD) value to determine the minimum threshold of the wavelet coefficients in the time series [37,38].…”
Section: Removing Noisementioning
confidence: 99%