2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1709.01201
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with State Estimation by Incorporation of the Unscented Kalman Filter

Eric Bradford,
Lars Imsland

Abstract: Nonlinear model predictive control has become a popular approach to deal with highly nonlinear and unsteady state systems, the performance of which can however deteriorate due to unaccounted uncertainties. Model predictive control is commonly used with states from a state estimator in place of the exact states without consideration of the error. In this paper an approach is proposed by incorporating the unscented Kalman filter into the NMPC problem, which propagates uncertainty introduced from both the state e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters for all test cases are the cross-entropy results for the condition with process noise variance 0.01. The resulting mean values for the MCTS hyperparameters were µ = [22,5,12,27]. The planning horizon of MPC was selected to match the optimized MCTS depth of 12.…”
Section: Cross-entropy For Tuning Solver Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters for all test cases are the cross-entropy results for the condition with process noise variance 0.01. The resulting mean values for the MCTS hyperparameters were µ = [22,5,12,27]. The planning horizon of MPC was selected to match the optimized MCTS depth of 12.…”
Section: Cross-entropy For Tuning Solver Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many of the methods above focus on robustness, they do not incorporate uncertainty over the parameters of the transition function. In [5], this is accounted for by using a SNMPC with an Unscented Kalman Filter to propagate the uncertainty over the state-space. However, this method requires an optimisation with chance constraints to be solved online and, to keep the problem feasible, the variance of the trajectories has to be artificially constrained.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, control tasks in reinforcement learning are usually more complex and therefore less suitable to linearisation, motivating the use of non-linear models [4]. Another motivation for more complex models is the ability to use of more expressive constraints, even if not directly involved in the physical process, such as economic criteria [5]. Despite its vast application in the linear case, the use of MPC in non-linear systems continues to be an increasingly active area of research in control theory [2], [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A disadvantage of the PCE-based SNMPC is that the computational cost scales exponentially with the number of uncertain parameters. 23,39 To address these concerns, two tractable approximations to the SNMPC problems with the incorporation of unscented Kalman filter (UKF) 40 and Gaussian process (GP) 40 were proposed. Taking advantage of the UKF which estimates and propagates the entire conditional distribution of the states over the prediction horizon by taking into account state estimation errors, the UKF-SNMPC reformulates the model cost and constraint functions by using the mean and covariance information, which yields a tractable control framework for handling nonlinear stochastic dynamic optimization (SDO) problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%