2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.05.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic periodic solution for a perturbed non-autonomous predator–prey model with generalized nonlinear harvesting and impulses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e proof is similar to that of eorem 3.1 in [20] and is omitted. Lemma 3 reveals the equivalence of (2) and (15), and hence, we will consider (15) later.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…e proof is similar to that of eorem 3.1 in [20] and is omitted. Lemma 3 reveals the equivalence of (2) and (15), and hence, we will consider (15) later.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Assume that the product equals unity if the number of factors is zero. Obviously, A 1 (t)and A 2 (t) are both T-periodic (for details, see [20]).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the above two classes of models can not describe some natural phenomena completely and it is believed that models with three or more species can explain the dynamical behaviors of the population accurately [5][6][7][8]. Predator-prey models are arguably known as the most fundamental building blocks of the biosystems and ecosystems as the biomasses are grown out of their resource, which have been widely investigated [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. As we all know, after a predator catches and feeds on a prey, the number of the predators will not increase at once, which needs the processes of digestion and absorption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%