2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-2795-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Reachability Analysis of Hybrid Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(333 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon can affect the aggregate power output significantly. It can be modeled by the so-called random jump mechanism [20], [16], [15], which is determined by a transition intensity function λ(q, x) : Q × R n → R + , where R + denotes the non-negative real numbers. In particular, the probability of a random jump happening in an infinitesimal time interval (t, t + dt] is given by λ(q(t), x(t))dt .…”
Section: A Population Uncertainties 1) Modeling Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This phenomenon can affect the aggregate power output significantly. It can be modeled by the so-called random jump mechanism [20], [16], [15], which is determined by a transition intensity function λ(q, x) : Q × R n → R + , where R + denotes the non-negative real numbers. In particular, the probability of a random jump happening in an infinitesimal time interval (t, t + dt] is given by λ(q(t), x(t))dt .…”
Section: A Population Uncertainties 1) Modeling Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result, though derived in the context of aggregate load modeling, can also be used to obtain forward equations of a general SHS with both deterministic and random switchings. Although SHS has been studied extensively in the literature [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], its probability density evolution cannot be explicitly characterized using the existing results, especially when there are deterministic switchings with general switching surfaces in multi-dimensional spaces. It is well known that for a standard diffusion process, the adjoint of its (strong) generator determines the form of the forward equation and the domain of the generator (indirectly) affects the boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers can now draw on an extended suite of mathematical techniques to evaluate FPTs, ranging from analytical descriptions for special cases including asymptotic expansions to semi-analytical approaches based on integral equations to direct numerical simulations [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. Notwithstanding these practical methods, the general solution to one of the most fundamental FPT problems is still unknown: diffusion to an arbitrary boundary [24,[32][33][34]. This is even more remarkable since diffusion processes are often used to approximate the dynamics of more complicated stochastic systems [16,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seminal papers include [47], [48] on reachability and [32], [49], [50] on invariance. Representative textbooks on set-valued control are [51], [52].…”
Section: Reachability and Invariancementioning
confidence: 99%