2011
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic state‐space temperature regulation of biochar production. Part I: Theoretical development

Abstract: This state-space regulator simultaneously controlled the indirect heat source and sample temperature by employing difficult-to-measure variables such as temperature stability in the description of the pyrolysis system's state-space. These attributes make a state-space controller an optimum control scheme for the production of a predictable, repeatable designer biochar.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blending, pelletilization and pyrolysis procedures that were followed in this study were reported in the early paper of Sigua et al (2014) and Novak et al (2014). Biochars were produced from each of the pelletized feedstocks using a slow pyrolysis procedure at 350°C (Cantrell and Martin, 2012). Each pelletized biochar particle had a length of between 10-20 mm and diameter of about 6-8 mm.…”
Section: Feedstock Description Biochar Production and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blending, pelletilization and pyrolysis procedures that were followed in this study were reported in the early paper of Sigua et al (2014) and Novak et al (2014). Biochars were produced from each of the pelletized feedstocks using a slow pyrolysis procedure at 350°C (Cantrell and Martin, 2012). Each pelletized biochar particle had a length of between 10-20 mm and diameter of about 6-8 mm.…”
Section: Feedstock Description Biochar Production and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pine chip (PC; Pinus taeda) was collected in Berkeley County, SC, USA. The process for pyrolysis of PC and PL has been previously described [9,33]. Briefly, the PC and PL were hammer milled into 6 mm flakes, blended on a per weight basis, and then pelletized through a 6.4 mm die using a PP2000 pellet mill (Pellet Pros, Inc., Davenport, IA, USA).…”
Section: Feedstocks and Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PL alone and PC:PL blends required the addition of deionized water to achieve a 30% moisture content for pelletization, while PC alone required the addition of a 50:50 (w:w) addition of deionized water and soybean oil to achieve a 30% moisture content for proper pelletization. Pelletized feedstocks were then subjected to slow pyrolysis at 350 °C in a retort [33] with a residence time of 2 h. After pyrolysis, pellets were retained by sorting with a 2 mm sieve. For this particular study, a post-pyrolysis step was incorporated to grind all biochar pellets into a dust capable of passing through a 0.42 mm sieve.…”
Section: Feedstocks and Pyrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to a run, the sorghum was oven-dried (103°C) overnight and then loaded into a mesh basket and placed into a Lindberg electric box furnace equipped with a gas tight retort (Model 51662; Lindberg/MPH, Riverside, MI). This particular furnace-retort was specially modified with a stochastic state-space regulator (Cantrell and Martin 2012) to ensure precision regulation of the final charring temperature. Samples were pyrolyzed under the following temperature schedule: (1) 60 min at 200°C for equilibration, (2) 240 min at 500°C, and (3) cooldown 4.25°C min −1 to 100°C.…”
Section: Feedstock Description and Biochar Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%