2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochasticity in Natural Forage Production Affects Use of Urban Areas by Black Bears: Implications to Management of Human-Bear Conflicts

Abstract: The rapid expansion of global urban development is increasing opportunities for wildlife to forage and become dependent on anthropogenic resources. Wildlife using urban areas are often perceived dichotomously as urban or not, with some individuals removed in the belief that dependency on anthropogenic resources is irreversible and can lead to increased human-wildlife conflict. For American black bears (Ursus americanus), little is known about the degree of bear urbanization and its ecological mechanisms to gui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
97
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(69 reference statements)
5
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we defined as the frequency of good natural food years and generated an independent identically distributed (iid) environmental sequences of good and poor natural food years using random draws from a binomial distribution. Second, we used vital rate estimates from Aspen (Baruch-Mordo et al, 2014) in conjunction with mean and 95% credible intervals for Western bear populations determined by Beston (2011) as a guide for selecting vital rate means and standard deviations for good and poor natural food years in the three scenario described in Section 2.3. We used these vital rate means and standard deviations to calculate parameters for beta and gamma distributions (see Appendix A).…”
Section: Population Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…First, we defined as the frequency of good natural food years and generated an independent identically distributed (iid) environmental sequences of good and poor natural food years using random draws from a binomial distribution. Second, we used vital rate estimates from Aspen (Baruch-Mordo et al, 2014) in conjunction with mean and 95% credible intervals for Western bear populations determined by Beston (2011) as a guide for selecting vital rate means and standard deviations for good and poor natural food years in the three scenario described in Section 2.3. We used these vital rate means and standard deviations to calculate parameters for beta and gamma distributions (see Appendix A).…”
Section: Population Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both urban scenarios (Low and High Removal), we assumed that available anthropogenic food sources resulted in normal cub production during poor natural food years (Baruch-Mordo et al, 2014;Beckmann and Lackey, 2008). During the Aspen study all adult females consistently gave birth on a two year cycle and the number of cubs/litter remained steady regardless of good or poor natural food availability, i.e., ar = 1 and 2.21 total cubs/litter (Baruch-Mordo et al, 2014). Because fewer than 10 adult females were monitored annually, we conservatively set ar = 0.95 and L = 1.15 female cubs/litter for good and poor natural food years.…”
Section: Scenario Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations