2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2008.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock and bond market interactions with level and asymmetry dynamics: An out-of-sample application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2006) showed that asymmetric dynamic conditional correlation (ADCC) GARCH model outclasses the DCC GARCH model with lower Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and higher log-likelihood value, and better adaptive to model the time-varying market integration. Besides, DCC GARCH does not account for asymmetries in conditional variances, covariances, and correlations, leading to an incorrect specification of the conditional variance-covariance matrix ( Cappiello et al., 2006 ; de Goeij and Marquering, 2009 ). Following Cappiello et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2006) showed that asymmetric dynamic conditional correlation (ADCC) GARCH model outclasses the DCC GARCH model with lower Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and higher log-likelihood value, and better adaptive to model the time-varying market integration. Besides, DCC GARCH does not account for asymmetries in conditional variances, covariances, and correlations, leading to an incorrect specification of the conditional variance-covariance matrix ( Cappiello et al., 2006 ; de Goeij and Marquering, 2009 ). Following Cappiello et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that not only variances, but also covariances, respond asymmetrically to return shocks. Furthermore, de Goeij and Marquering (2009) extended the asymmetric multivariate model of de Goeij and Marquering (2004) and incorporated level effects and cross-asymmetries in conditional variances and covariances. They showed that the level effect was significant for bond return volatility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 presents the evolution of the estimated correlation coefficients obtained from this model and shows that they vary considerably over time. This is especially important for the purpose of our research because optimal allocation is only relevant if conditional correlations fluctuate over time (de Goeij and Marquering 2009). Moreover, according to international portfolio diversification theory, the lower the extent of correlation between markets, the greater the benefits from international diversification.…”
Section: In-sample Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%