2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock market volatility spillovers: Evidence for Latin America

Abstract: We extend the framework of Diebold and Yilmaz [2009] and Diebold and Yilmaz [2012] and construct volatility spillover indexes using a DCC-GARCH framework to model the multivariate relationships of volatility among assets. We compute spillover indexes directly from the series of asset returns and recognize the time-variant nature of the covariance matrix. Our approach allows for a better understanding of the movements of financial returns within a framework of volatility spillovers. We apply our method to stock… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
0
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
47
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from the figures and the tables that the reactions are different in different countries. In summary, we conclude that there is evidence for contagion and interdependence of squared stock index returns during the GFC and EZC that is in line with previous studies (e.g., Wang et al 2017;Gamba-Santamaria et al 2017;Jiang et al 2017;Bonga-Bonga 2018). Wang et al (2017) find evidence for contagion during the GFC on G7 countries (except for Japan), Russia and India where US is used as sources of contagion and no contagion is found on Brazil, China, and Japan from the same source.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It is clear from the figures and the tables that the reactions are different in different countries. In summary, we conclude that there is evidence for contagion and interdependence of squared stock index returns during the GFC and EZC that is in line with previous studies (e.g., Wang et al 2017;Gamba-Santamaria et al 2017;Jiang et al 2017;Bonga-Bonga 2018). Wang et al (2017) find evidence for contagion during the GFC on G7 countries (except for Japan), Russia and India where US is used as sources of contagion and no contagion is found on Brazil, China, and Japan from the same source.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…They construct spillover indexes within a VAR system in which the covariance matrix is assumed to be time-invariant, and compute volatilities through a particular definition involving daily high and low prices. Gamba-Santamaria et al [2016] present an extension in which a DCC-GARCH model is used for modelling the multivariate relationships of volatility among different assets. This extension allows for a better representation of observable volatility clusters (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the papers surveyed in this study, just one study have examined volatility transmissions in the Nigerian stock market (see, Kpughur er al,, 2017) however, it adopts aggregate data and examines transmissions between the naira exchange rate and the stock market using approaches different from this study. There are also studies for other regions, worthy of mention is China (see, e.g., Wang and Zhang, 2011;Sharma, 2017;Jebran et al, 2017), BRICS (see, e.g., Ramaprasad and Biljana, 2007;Boubaker and Raza, 2017;Nareshet al, 2018), U.S (see, e.g., Arouri et al, 2011;Ghouse and Khan, 2017;Kinnunen, 2017;Oh, 2017;Bekiros et al, 2016), Europe (see, e.g., Arouri et al, 2011;Chang et al, 2013;Sharma, 2017;Blau, 2017), South America (see, e.g., Vasco and Agudelo, 2014;Gamba-Santamaria et al, 2016)among others. Furthermore, we notice that there are few or no studies on returns and volatility transmission at the sectoral level in Sub Saharan African regions, this is probably due to data inadequacies or constraints.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%