2000
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.205429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock Option Plans for Non-Executive Employees

Abstract: We examine determinants of non-executive employee stock option holdings, grants, and exercises for 756 firms during 1994-1997. We find that firms use greater stock option compensation when facing capital requirements and financing constraints. Our results are also consistent with firms using options to attract and retain certain types of employees as well as to create incentives to increase firm value. After controlling for economic determinants and stock returns, option exercises are greater (less) when the f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
350
2
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(383 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
29
350
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Brennan and Subramanyam's (1995) simultaneous-equations model provides evidence of this endogenous (Baker and Hall, 1998). Further, options owned by the executives who are likely to make disclosure decisions constitute a small fraction of shares reserved for options (Core and Guay, 2001).…”
Section: The Relation Between Voluntary Disclosure Institutional Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brennan and Subramanyam's (1995) simultaneous-equations model provides evidence of this endogenous (Baker and Hall, 1998). Further, options owned by the executives who are likely to make disclosure decisions constitute a small fraction of shares reserved for options (Core and Guay, 2001).…”
Section: The Relation Between Voluntary Disclosure Institutional Invmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Hall and Liebman (1998) [22] established that value of stocks options owned by the CEO helps enhance the firm's performance. Core and Guay (2001) [12]credited stock options as a mechanism of motivating employees and improving firm value. Sesil, Kroumova, Blasi, and Kruse (2002) [53]pointed out that issuance stock options by the new economy firms (i.e., software, hightechnology manufacturing, pharmaceuticals and semiconductor) results in better performance.…”
Section: Arguments In Favor Of Issuance Of Esopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring of workers can be particularly costly when the …rm is larger, more decentralized, there is more noise in the business environment, and the …rm has greater growth opportunities (Core and Guay, 2001, Demsetz and Lehn, 1985, Jensen and Meckling, 1992, and Smith and Watts, 1992. On the other hand, transparent and small …rms may be in a better position to assess the quality of new worker ideas.…”
Section: Pro…t Sharing Inside the …Rmmentioning
confidence: 99%