2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ssci.2018.8628777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock Price Manipulation Detection using Generative Adversarial Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two main forms of manipulations used by attackers called pump and dump and spoof trading. The main goal of pump and dump trading is to increase a stock value and then sell it once it has been increased to obtain the maximum profit possible [1]. The pump and dump manipulations have two main stages; the pumping stage, where the manipulator falsely raises the stock price and the dumping stage.…”
Section: Stock Market Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…There are two main forms of manipulations used by attackers called pump and dump and spoof trading. The main goal of pump and dump trading is to increase a stock value and then sell it once it has been increased to obtain the maximum profit possible [1]. The pump and dump manipulations have two main stages; the pumping stage, where the manipulator falsely raises the stock price and the dumping stage.…”
Section: Stock Market Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning approaches to this problem were introduced in [1] [7] to find an innovative solution to detect stock market manipulations. A deep general adversarial network (GAN) approach was first introduced in [1] and it showed a promise in detecting pump and dump manipulations. However, the solution was limited only to detect this one type of manipulation and had a drop-in accuracy when executed on unseen data.…”
Section: Stock Market Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although, significant detection results were claimed using this model, the model is provided with the number of decomposed components from GMM which is misleading as calling any number of components as normal and the rest abnormal cannot be justified for all the feature sets without a significant criterion. Leangurun et al [20] proposed the use of generative adversarial networks for the detection of pump-and-dump manipulation scheme and achieved 68.1% detection accuracy. The authors focused their work on Thailand stock market and trained their model using LSTM as the base structure upon normal data and later tested it using a test data having both normal and abnormal trades/transactions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%