2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2010.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock price volatility and overreaction in a political crisis: The effects of corporate governance and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
2
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
42
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bird in hand theory (Gordon, 1959;Lintner, 1956), a theory that claims the influence of stock return toward corporate value, states that dividend policy will increase corporate value due to uncertainty in cash flow company in the future making dividend more interested for investor than capital gains. Some previous studies have discussed the effect of stock return on corporate value, for example Huang et al (2011), who found out that investors should seriously assess corporate governance when making investment decisions because not only did it have a positive effect on good governance, but also was able to stabilize stock prices during the crisis. The general conclusion from this theory and previous studies is that stock return has a significant influence on corporate value.…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Stock Return Toward Financial Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bird in hand theory (Gordon, 1959;Lintner, 1956), a theory that claims the influence of stock return toward corporate value, states that dividend policy will increase corporate value due to uncertainty in cash flow company in the future making dividend more interested for investor than capital gains. Some previous studies have discussed the effect of stock return on corporate value, for example Huang et al (2011), who found out that investors should seriously assess corporate governance when making investment decisions because not only did it have a positive effect on good governance, but also was able to stabilize stock prices during the crisis. The general conclusion from this theory and previous studies is that stock return has a significant influence on corporate value.…”
Section: Moderating Effect Of Stock Return Toward Financial Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Frye et al (2006) showed that CSR¯rms are more risk averse than non-CSR¯rms, resulting in a weaker link between CEO pay and¯rm performance in CSR¯rms than in non-CSR¯rms. Finally, other contributions highlighted that¯rms with better corporate governance tend to experience smaller stock price volatility (Huang et al, 2011). Therefore, if a lower risk pro¯le is generally associated with both greater CSR performance and a better governance system, the inclusion of sustainability targets in remuneration contracts should represent a mitigation tool of excessive risk-taking.…”
Section: Sustainability Targets In Remuneration Contracts and The Banmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kouwenberg et al (2014) offered an interesting finding that portfolios with bad corporate governance produce high returns as measured by using realized returns compared to portfolios with good corporate governance. Other research conducted by Huang et al (2011) stated that corporate governance has a positive effect on stock prices and can reduce the volatility of stock prices during a crisis. It becomes one of the considerations for investors in making investment decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%