Stock Prices and Economic Activity in the Time of Coronavirus

Abstract

Stock prices and workplace mobility trace out striking clockwise paths in daily data from mid-February to late May 2020. Global stock prices fell 30 percent from 17 February to 12 March, before mobility declined. Over the next 11 days, stocks fell another 10 percentage points as mobility dropped 40 percent. From 23 March to 9 April, stocks recovered half their losses and mobility fell further. From 9 April to late May, both stocks and mobility rose modestly. This dynamic plays out across the 35 countries in our sample, with a few notable exceptions. We also find that stricter lockdown policies, both in-country and globally, drove larger declines in national stock prices conditional on pandemic severity, workplace mobility, and income support and debt relief policies. Looking more closely at the two largest economies, the pandemic had greater effects on stock market levels and volatilities in the U.S. than in China. Narrative evidence confirms the dominant-and historically unprecedented-role of pandemic-related developments for stock prices in both countries. The size of the global stock market crash in reaction to the pandemic is many times larger than a standard asset-pricing model implies.

The resilience of green firms in the twirl of COVID‐19: Evidence from S&P500 Carbon Efficiency Index with a Fourier approach

“…Finally, we provide evidence that the overall government response index, which is the average of the stringency, containment health and economy indicators, positively affects the S&P500 CEI. A group of papers in the literature confirms that government lockdown policies have a short-term negative impact on stock returns and the real economy (Anh & Gan, 2020;Davis et al, 2021;Mandel & Veetil, 2020). On the other hand, there is evidence that health policies and economic incentives positively affect stock returns (Kizys et al, 2021;Rubbaniy et al, 2021;Zaremba et al, 2021).…”

Internet Access and its Implications for Productivity, Inequality, and Resilience

“…See Figure6inDavis, Liu and Sheng (2021). 4 BBD show that the self-assessed productivity effects of WFH align reasonably well with less subjective measures based on commuting time savings.…”

Household investment diversification amid Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from Chinese investors

“…A large body of literature attributes the changes to the household's sudden change of risk tolerance, since the pandemic is a typical extreme event for all households (see for example, Baker et al, 2020b ; Giglio et al, Heo et al, 201; Yue et al, 2020 ). Another strand of literature referring the change of economic environment as the major contributor of the change, as Davis et al, (2021) , Kizys et al (2021) finds. In this paper, we focus on microeconomic theory that household's particular behaivour as the direct mechanism driving the change of investment style.…”