2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock prices prediction via tensor decomposition and links forecast

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We discuss here potential mechanisms driving the treatment effects unveiled in Section 5, assisted by descriptive evidence from parental surveys administered at MTP meetings. 41 Although we can ultimately offer only suggestive evidence, we argue that our results reflect the impact of providing hard-to-find information on non-test score school attributes (see Section 3).…”
Section: Discussion and Survey Evidencementioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We discuss here potential mechanisms driving the treatment effects unveiled in Section 5, assisted by descriptive evidence from parental surveys administered at MTP meetings. 41 Although we can ultimately offer only suggestive evidence, we argue that our results reflect the impact of providing hard-to-find information on non-test score school attributes (see Section 3).…”
Section: Discussion and Survey Evidencementioning
confidence: 72%
“…Assuming the average competition effect is similar between exposed and unexposed parents, a one standard deviation higher exposure to treated peers increases enrolment of non-treated parents at MTP-promoted schools by 1.5 pp (= 0.55 + 0.95), almost half the direct impact of the programme 41. We report data for a survey administered in 2019.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This last result is consistent with FSM learning about their advantage in a runoff system as they gain political experience. 41 Balancing on observable characteristics and the MCrary test are reported in Table B. We can further apply the identification strategy developed in Section 4.2 to estimate the effect of FSM's electoral success on a set of indicators for the economic performance of the municipality.…”
Section: Electoral System and Populist's Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the role of individuals' characteristics on the vaccination decisions, we replicate our baseline analysis by splitting the sample according to the individual's health status and income. 41 Using the information on costsharing exemptions certified by the NHS, we identify four categories of individuals: (i) those affected by a chronic disease, (ii) those with poor health status and low income, (iii) those with a low income, and (iv) the remaining individuals with no certified exemptions. As mentioned in Section 2.4, since cost-sharing exemption associated with a chronic and severe health condition imply free access to a great proportion of specialist visits and drugs, we expect the cost-sharing exemption for low income to play no additional role, and thus interpret the four categories above as providing a ranking in the health-income space which improves from categories (i) to (iv).…”
Section: Heterogeneous Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%