2016
DOI: 10.23849/npafcb6/363-390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock-Recruit Analyses of Fraser River Sockeye Salmon

Abstract: Three types of stock-recruit models (log-log, Ricker, Beverton-Holt) were applied to 57 years of adult returns (R) and eff ective female spawners (E) data from 17 biologically-based Conservation Units (CUs) of sockeye salmon from the Fraser River in British Columbia, Canada (hereafter "Fraser sockeye"). Log-log regressions of R on E showed little evidence of eff ects of density (within CUs) on survival, implying that habitat capacity does not presently limit Fraser sockeye abundance. Shared survival among CUs,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unaccounted variation in migratory behavior among different sockeye salmon stocks, including multiple ocean entries for each brood year, and uncertainty in spawner, smolt, and catch abundances (Akenhead et al, 2016; Connors et al, 2020; Grant et al, 2011; Ogden et al, 2015), could contribute to variation in the linear relationship between (Chl‐a) and stock‐specific productivity (Table 1). Channel construction in the Nadina and Weaver Creek nurseries and mine pollution in the Quesnel Lake watershed could have impacted productivity metrics for these individual stocks (Grant et al, 2011, 2017), potentially leading to the positive ∆AIC (i.e., decreased model performance) for these individual stocks (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unaccounted variation in migratory behavior among different sockeye salmon stocks, including multiple ocean entries for each brood year, and uncertainty in spawner, smolt, and catch abundances (Akenhead et al, 2016; Connors et al, 2020; Grant et al, 2011; Ogden et al, 2015), could contribute to variation in the linear relationship between (Chl‐a) and stock‐specific productivity (Table 1). Channel construction in the Nadina and Weaver Creek nurseries and mine pollution in the Quesnel Lake watershed could have impacted productivity metrics for these individual stocks (Grant et al, 2011, 2017), potentially leading to the positive ∆AIC (i.e., decreased model performance) for these individual stocks (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%