2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock-recruitment dynamics of a freshwater clupeid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Density‐dependent mortality previously has been described for many clupeids, including Atlantic Herring Clupea harengus (Cardinale and Arrhenius 2000), Gizzard Shad (Miranda et al. 2020), river herring (Winters and Wheeler 1996; Devine et al. 2021), Sprat Sprattus sprattus (Casini et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Density‐dependent mortality previously has been described for many clupeids, including Atlantic Herring Clupea harengus (Cardinale and Arrhenius 2000), Gizzard Shad (Miranda et al. 2020), river herring (Winters and Wheeler 1996; Devine et al. 2021), Sprat Sprattus sprattus (Casini et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…2021) and Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepedianum (Miranda et al. 2020). The highly variable and density‐dependent mortality processes in the egg and larval stages often defines the transition of recruits to the more stable and density‐independent mortality of older juveniles and adult fishes (Ricker 1954; Beverton and Holt 1957; Shepherd and Cushing 1980).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We developed dorsal‐aspect TS– L and TS– W equations for Gizzard Shad, as no known equations existed for this species. Our equations should have wide applicability given that Gizzard Shad often dominate fish assemblages throughout southern and Midwestern U.S. water bodies, accounting for up to 90% of prey fish biomass in reservoir ecosystems (Miranda 1983; Carline et al 1984; Johnson et al 1988; Miranda et al 2020). This species has also been shown to be ecologically important, acting as an ecosystem engineer in productive reservoirs (Vanni et al 2005) and serving as important prey for top predators in both natural lakes (e.g., Lake Erie, USA–Canada) and tributary impoundments (Knight et al 1984; Hartman and Margraf 1992; Michaletz 1997; Denlinger et al 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although species‐specific, dorsal‐aspect (transducer oriented vertically in the water column) TS–size relationships have been developed for some prey fishes, including Alewife Alosa pseudoharen gus (Warner et al 2002; Brooking and Rudstam 2009), Bream Abramis brama (Godlewska 2004; Frouzova et al 2005), and Rainbow Smelt Osmerus mordax (Rudstam et al 2003), among others (Simmonds and MacLennan 2005; Pollom and Rose 2016), they are still lacking for many important prey species. For example, although a horizontal‐aspect equation exists (transducer oriented horizontally in the water column; Johnson et al 2019a), no dorsal‐aspect TS–size equation exists for the Gizzard Shad Dorosoma cepedianum , a prey fish that can dominate the biomass of freshwater lentic and lotic fish communities in southern and mid‐latitudes of the United States (Miranda 1983; Carline et al 1984; Johnson et al 1988; Miranda et al 2020). In addition to being abundant, the high energetic value of Gizzard Shad (Fagan and Fitzpatrick 1978; Pierce et al 1980; Eggleton and Schramm 2002) often leads to this species comprising a large proportion of predator diets in rivers, natural lakes, and reservoirs (Storck 1986; Michaletz 1997; Denlinger et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%