2016
DOI: 10.19044/esj.2016.v12n4p79
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock Returns And Volatility İn An Emerging Equity Market. Evidence From Kenya

Abstract: This study investigates volatility pattern of Kenyan stock market based on time series data which consists of daily closing prices of NSE Index for the period 2ndJanuary 2001 to 31st December 2014. The analysis has been done using both symmetric and asymmetric Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedastic (GARCH) models. The study provides evidence for the existence of a positive and significant risk premium. Moreover, volatility shocks on daily returns at the stock market are transitory. We do not fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings agree with the results obtained by Bahadur (2008) using the Nepalese stock market data; Jayasuriya, Shambora and Rossiter ( 2009) analysing mature and emerging markets; Cheng, Jahn-Pavar and Rothman (2010) considering stock markets in the Middle East and North Africa; and Niyitegeka and Tewari (2013) analysing South African stock exchange. Such results drive home the point that positive shocks and negative shocks both have the same effect on future volatility (Ndwiga & Muriu 2016). The absence of leverage effects can be attributed to price limits restrictions, call over market systems and the absence of overreaction (underreaction) to bad news and under-reaction (overreaction) to good news.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…These findings agree with the results obtained by Bahadur (2008) using the Nepalese stock market data; Jayasuriya, Shambora and Rossiter ( 2009) analysing mature and emerging markets; Cheng, Jahn-Pavar and Rothman (2010) considering stock markets in the Middle East and North Africa; and Niyitegeka and Tewari (2013) analysing South African stock exchange. Such results drive home the point that positive shocks and negative shocks both have the same effect on future volatility (Ndwiga & Muriu 2016). The absence of leverage effects can be attributed to price limits restrictions, call over market systems and the absence of overreaction (underreaction) to bad news and under-reaction (overreaction) to good news.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…al., 2017, they concluded that the NSE exhibited high volatility persistence. On the contrary, Ndwiga and Muriu (2016) found evidence for volatility persistence at the NSE but not highly persistent. In addition, Alagidede and Panagiotidis (2009), Chege et.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Using data for the period 01/01/2008 to 10/10/2010, they found evidence for time varying stock return volatility, and negative return shock increases volatility than positive returns shocks. Ndwiga and Muriu (2016) analyzed the dynamics of conditional stock returns volatility for the period 2/01/2001-31/03/2014 using symmetric and asymmetric models. They found that the NSE returns are predictable, the market volatility effects on the stock returns are not explosive, the market rewards increased risk, the market exhibit volatility clustering, and there is a day of the week effect on Thursday and Tuesday due to the sale of government securities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The empirical review focuses only on the Nigerian stock market and other African stock markets. Ndwiga and Muriu (2016) showed no evidence of leverage effect and high volatility persistence but found significant positive relationship between risk and return in the Kenyan stock market. Owidi and Mugo-Waweru (2016) showed that volatility is more persistent during the bullish period than bearish period in the Kenyan stock market.…”
Section: Empirical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 89%