2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock structure analysis of Megalaspis cordyla (Linnaeus, 1758) along the Indian coast based on truss network analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study by Imre et al (2002) demonstrated morphological variation in the caudal area in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) from microhabitats differing in water velocity. Sajina et al (2010) have also found variation in the caudal area of Megalaspis cordyla from the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A study by Imre et al (2002) demonstrated morphological variation in the caudal area in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) from microhabitats differing in water velocity. Sajina et al (2010) have also found variation in the caudal area of Megalaspis cordyla from the Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Stock structures are often identified and verified on the basis of their different life history strategies and genetic structures. However, morphometric traits are still often used in this field (Sajina et al 2011). Traditional measurements are based on the conventional orthogonal method, which uses length and width to describe the variables for species with rigid body forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The truss analysis is important because it covers the entire shape of the fish in a form of a uniform network, and thus the probability of extracting the morphometric differences among the different fish populations is increased. Working on Indian fishes like Catla catla, Rastrelliger kanagurta, and Megalaspis cordyla, a limited number of workers used the truss morphometry to discriminate the stocks [8][9][10]. A survey of literature showed that no such work on morphometric variations using truss was carried out on C. punctatus so far, except for the work carried out by Khan et al [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%