2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STOIIP validation for a heterogeneous multi-layered reservoir of a mature field using an integrated 3D geo-cellular dynamic model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The static reservoir model was prepared using Schlumberger's Petrel software suite, 2015 version, on the basis of the latest processed seismic data from the J1 field. Geological modeling is highly important because it (1) provides a robust means of field evaluation and (2) enables volumetric calculations that provide the best technical case for determining static stock tank oil originally in place (STOOIP) and gas initially in place (GIIP) values [42]. The inputs for reservoir simulation were supported by history-matching the test well to the potential drilling targets and their associated profiles.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The static reservoir model was prepared using Schlumberger's Petrel software suite, 2015 version, on the basis of the latest processed seismic data from the J1 field. Geological modeling is highly important because it (1) provides a robust means of field evaluation and (2) enables volumetric calculations that provide the best technical case for determining static stock tank oil originally in place (STOOIP) and gas initially in place (GIIP) values [42]. The inputs for reservoir simulation were supported by history-matching the test well to the potential drilling targets and their associated profiles.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of the volume of hydrocarbon in a reservoir is a core task in the upstream petroleum industry, and it provides the basis for a field development plan [1][2][3]. Two types of methods are used for evaluating the volume of hydrocarbon in place (HIP): volumetric methods and dynamic methods [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic methods are based on principles that depend on production data. They include the Material Balance Equation and simulations, while volumetric methods are static and rely on the volume of the net reservoir and petro physical properties, including the DOI: 10.31695/IJASRE.2023.9.12.5 area (A), the thickness (h), the net pay (he), gross thickness (ht), the porosity (Φ), the water saturation (Sw) and eventually the formation volume factor of hydrocarbon (FVF) in place [2,6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%