1975
DOI: 10.1139/b75-137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stomatal distribution and size in southern Appalachian hardwoods

Abstract: In 1972 and 1973 a scanning electron microscope was used to study stomata and cuticular surfaces of shade leaves collected from trees growing in the mountain and eastern coalfield region of Kentucky. Stomatal frequency and size determinations are presented for about 50 southern Appalachian forest species. Stomata varied from 6534/cm2 in Asimina triloba to 90 909/cm2 in Quercus palustris. Mesic species had fewer stomata per unit leaf surface area than xeric species. Stomatal frequency was not related to shade t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5. herbacea is amphistomatous (stomata present on both leaf surfaces); therefore measurements were made on the herbarium and fresh leaves on both the abaxial {n = 25) and adaxial {n = 25) leaf surfaces to obtain a mean stomatal length comparable to that obtained from the fossil cuticles {n = 50). Unlike previous studies (Carpenter & Smith, 1975;Jones, 1977;Pallardy & Kozlowski, 1979), stomatal length was poorly correlated with stomatal density {r^ = 9%; P> 0-05).…”
Section: Y Beer Ling and F I Woodward Vegetation In General Circontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…5. herbacea is amphistomatous (stomata present on both leaf surfaces); therefore measurements were made on the herbarium and fresh leaves on both the abaxial {n = 25) and adaxial {n = 25) leaf surfaces to obtain a mean stomatal length comparable to that obtained from the fossil cuticles {n = 50). Unlike previous studies (Carpenter & Smith, 1975;Jones, 1977;Pallardy & Kozlowski, 1979), stomatal length was poorly correlated with stomatal density {r^ = 9%; P> 0-05).…”
Section: Y Beer Ling and F I Woodward Vegetation In General Circontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Stomata density was found to be unrelated to SLA and leaf nutrient contents. The observed decrease of stomata density with successional time does probably not reflect a gradient in light conditions, as stomata density has been described to be not associated with shade tolerance [34]. Instead, a high stomata density in early-successional stages might allow a more effective and fine-tuned control of conductivity [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Stomatal traits are linked with foliar conductance for CO 2 and water transport (e.g. Salisbury 1927;Carpenter & Smith 1975;Woodward 1987;Von Willert et al 1992;Beerling & Kelly 1996;Gutschik 1999); epidermal cell size to nuclear DNA amount, phenology and drought tolerance (e.g. Cutler et al 1977;Grime et al 1985;van Arendonk & Poorter 1994).…”
Section: Traits and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%