2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.13379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stomatal sensitivity to CO2 diverges between angiosperm and gymnosperm tree species

Abstract: The response of tree leaf gas exchange to elevated CO2 concentrations has been investigated in numerous experiments along the past 30 years. Stomatal regulation is a major plant control over leaf gas exchange, and the response to the increasing CO2 will shape the biological activity of forests in the future. Here, we collected 144 records from 57 species on stomatal conductance in CO2 manipulation experiments on trees (340–980 ppm CO2). CO2‐induced stomatal downregulation was calculated as the slope of the lin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(71 reference statements)
4
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in the tropical tree species A. glandulosa neither warming nor elevated CO 2 significantly reduced V CMax , but the combination of the two did (Fauset et al, 2019). In contrast to common observations in studies in which only CO 2 is increased (e.g., Ainsworth & Rogers, 2007; Klein & Ramon, 2019), stomatal conductance and stomatal density were not reduced in our combined warming and CO 2 enrichment experiment, suggesting that the CO 2 effect may be temperature dependent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in the tropical tree species A. glandulosa neither warming nor elevated CO 2 significantly reduced V CMax , but the combination of the two did (Fauset et al, 2019). In contrast to common observations in studies in which only CO 2 is increased (e.g., Ainsworth & Rogers, 2007; Klein & Ramon, 2019), stomatal conductance and stomatal density were not reduced in our combined warming and CO 2 enrichment experiment, suggesting that the CO 2 effect may be temperature dependent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, however, stomatal conductance of the spruce trees was not affected by elevated CO 2 and photosynthetic capacity showed little downward adjustment (Leuzinger and Bader, 2012;Klein et al, 2016a). This finding is in line with a general divergence between broadleaved trees and conifers, with the latter tending to maintain stomatal conductance under elevated CO 2 (Klein and Ramon, 2019). It may also be related to the aforementioned tendency of the conifers needles to maintain or even increase their N concentration under elevated CO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Among the different facets of climate change, there are large uncertainties in the literature regarding the potential effects of increasing atmospheric CO 2 (Cheaib et al 2012). However, it is known that an increase in atmospheric CO 2 can trigger the plasticity of certain traits, but there is little data available so far (Domec et al 2017;Klein and Ramon 2019). In our last simulation exercise, we tried to evaluate the potential effects of trait plasticity on the risk of oak hydraulic failure at the end of the century for the RCP8.5 scenario (900 ppm).…”
Section: Application To Predict Drought Stress Under Current and Future Climatementioning
confidence: 99%