2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stooling Characteristics in Children With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been described previously, 31 the number of stools passed per day does not differ between children with IBS and healthy children, similar to our current study, but stools were looser in the IBS group (lower percentage of Bristol Stool Scale 3-5 and higher percentage of 6-7), likely given that approximately 17% of the IBS group was either of the diarrheal or mixed subtype. Similarly, as previously reported, the majority of children with IBS fall into the IBS-Constipation and IBS-Unsubtyped groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As has been described previously, 31 the number of stools passed per day does not differ between children with IBS and healthy children, similar to our current study, but stools were looser in the IBS group (lower percentage of Bristol Stool Scale 3-5 and higher percentage of 6-7), likely given that approximately 17% of the IBS group was either of the diarrheal or mixed subtype. Similarly, as previously reported, the majority of children with IBS fall into the IBS-Constipation and IBS-Unsubtyped groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…27 Using stool form, participants confirmed as IBS then were subtyped as: IBS-C (constipation-predominant); IBS-D (diarrhea-predominant; IBS-M (mixed); or IBS-U (unsubtyped). 31 Stools described as Bristol Stool Form Scale 1 and 2 were deemed constipation, 3-5 normal, and 6-7 as diarrhea.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for low recruitment number (20 vs 27) may be due to that the study population included children with d-IBS who had on average >18 stools per week. Weidler et al 13 reported that the mean daily stool number in children with d-IBS was 1.01±0.44 compared to healthy children with 0.7±0.30 per day. This represents approximately 7±3 bowel movements per week, far below that of the population recruited for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, only modest differences in stool form and frequency were found between children with IBS and healthy children, and childhood IBS subtypes could not be differentiated by stool frequency. 13 However, we enrolled only patients who had stool frequencies averaging 18.7±6.4 per week, a higher number than normal children, and greater than those reported for d-IBS, and hence chose stools frequency as the primary end point. 13 The nonsignificant reduction in stool frequency at the end of treatment in both groups could be related in part to the placebo response observed in FGID treatment trials, that has been attributed in part to the attention given to enrolled patients, including detailed explanation, reassurance, close monitoring, and ready access to the researchers, which may produce a therapeutic effect, a bias leading to an error in estimating the treatment effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation