2009
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.177071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
280
2
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 373 publications
(301 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
280
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the validity of these instruments for measuring either spasticity or muscle tone was beyond the scope of this study. After the start of our study a manuscript was published entitled, ''Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity'' (Fleuren et al, 2010). Taking their paper into account, we recommend that the validity of the MAS be examined further in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the validity of these instruments for measuring either spasticity or muscle tone was beyond the scope of this study. After the start of our study a manuscript was published entitled, ''Stop using the Ashworth Scale for the assessment of spasticity'' (Fleuren et al, 2010). Taking their paper into account, we recommend that the validity of the MAS be examined further in future studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical assessment of tone is subjective, using manual assessment by rating resistance to passive movement on scales such as the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) for stroke (Fleuren et al 2010) and the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) for PD (Goetz et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the reliability and validity of these scales has been recently challenged [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. In an attempt to improve the quality of the Ashworth scales, Ansari et al modified the Bohannon-Smith modified Ashworth scale, titling the new scale the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale (MMAS) [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%