2020
DOI: 10.15441/ceem.19.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STOP5: a hot debrief model for resuscitation cases in the emergency department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 17 It can encourage post-event ‘hot debriefs’ between team members to identify points of improvement for future interventions. 18 Furthermore, since feedback and repetitive practice are key factors for training NTS, every real-life resuscitation provides an opportunity to observe, discuss and improve NTS. 2 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 17 It can encourage post-event ‘hot debriefs’ between team members to identify points of improvement for future interventions. 18 Furthermore, since feedback and repetitive practice are key factors for training NTS, every real-life resuscitation provides an opportunity to observe, discuss and improve NTS. 2 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posters teaching and encouraging mindfulness were hung throughout the unit. We used Walker et al 40 STOP 5 (Summarize, Things that went well, Opportunities for improvement, Points for action) debrief method and provided copies for the charge nurse to use for debriefing sessions (see Figure ). ED administrative staff designated and transformed an unused room in the emergency department to a serenity room.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the STOP 5 model is intended to enable any member of the resuscitation team to initiate the hot debrief, starting with statements that seek to establish a psychologically safe environment through shared debrief principles such as confidentiality, the voluntary nature of participation and that the process is not about blaming but intended to improve patient care. The team then progresses through guided group discussion: ‘S, summarize the case; T, things that went well; O, opportunities to improve; and P, points to action and responsibilities’ 8 . Application of action‐research cycles may yield frameworks that are more locally tailored, such as the TAKE STOCK framework 9 .…”
Section: What Should a Hot Debrief Involve?mentioning
confidence: 99%