2019
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stopped in our tracks: From ‘giving an account’ to an ethics of recognition in feminist praxis

Abstract: When the Western Australian government announced in 2010 that Indigenous people would be compensated for unpaid wages, a Yindjibarndi woman named Bigali Hanlon submitted an application to access her government files so that she could lodge a claim. At the age of four, Bigali was taken from her home in Mulga Downs, Western Australia to live in a church‐run hostel for ‘fair‐skinned’ Indigenous children until she was sent into indentured domestic service as a teenager. Three large files document her history. Thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially their conceptualizations of gender (Hancock & Tyler, 2007; Jeanes, 2007; Pullen, 2006) and how it is performed in organizations (De Coster & Zanoni, 2019; Phillips & Knowles, 2012; Simpson et al., 2020) has inspired MOS scholars. This work has discussed how management and organization theory can be queered (Souza, Brewis, and Rumens, 2016; Tyler & Cohen, 2008), how resistance toward marginalizing and excluding management practices can be achieved (Bowring, 2004), how embodiment relates to inclusion (Tyler, 2018) and how Butler's ethics based on recognition applies to management and organization (Borgerson, 2005; Milroy et al., 2019; Rhodes, 2017). This vast work includes few mentions of vulnerability most often using an individualist perspective on vulnerability and treat it as an attribute of individuals or groups (cf.…”
Section: Current Discussion On Vulnerability In the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially their conceptualizations of gender (Hancock & Tyler, 2007; Jeanes, 2007; Pullen, 2006) and how it is performed in organizations (De Coster & Zanoni, 2019; Phillips & Knowles, 2012; Simpson et al., 2020) has inspired MOS scholars. This work has discussed how management and organization theory can be queered (Souza, Brewis, and Rumens, 2016; Tyler & Cohen, 2008), how resistance toward marginalizing and excluding management practices can be achieved (Bowring, 2004), how embodiment relates to inclusion (Tyler, 2018) and how Butler's ethics based on recognition applies to management and organization (Borgerson, 2005; Milroy et al., 2019; Rhodes, 2017). This vast work includes few mentions of vulnerability most often using an individualist perspective on vulnerability and treat it as an attribute of individuals or groups (cf.…”
Section: Current Discussion On Vulnerability In the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of scholars, practitioners and activists have already drawn on and developed insights from Butler's texts. This has often involved re-framing their earliest writing through an organizational lens (Harding et al, 2017(Harding et al, , 2022Kenny, 2019;Milroy et al, 2019;Parker, 2002;Pullen & Knights, 2007;Riach et al, 2014Riach et al, , 2016Rumens, 2018;Tyler, 2019;Varman & Al-Amoudi, 2016). But as Butler's own interests in organizational lives and contexts continue to evolve, so too do the possibilities of their work speaking more directly to organizational scholarship and activism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%