Proceedings of the Joint International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems 2004
DOI: 10.1145/1005686.1005743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage device performance prediction with CART models

Abstract: Acknowledgements: We thank the members and companies of the PDL Consortium (including EMC, Hewlett-Packard, Hitachi, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, IBM, Intel, LSI Logic, Microsoft, Network Appliance, Oracle, Panasas, Seagate, Sun, and Veritas) for their interest, insights, feedback, and support. We thank IBM for partly funding this work through a CAS student fellowship and a faculty partnership award.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Caching effect is an important measure can make a significant difference on prediction accuracy, which was missing in the feature vector designed by Wang et al [9]. Considering that hitting in the buffer cache is basically determined by temporal locality of accessed blocks [12], we propose an approximate LRU stack to efficiently track recency of requested blocks and use it as a measure in the feature vector.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Caching effect is an important measure can make a significant difference on prediction accuracy, which was missing in the feature vector designed by Wang et al [9]. Considering that hitting in the buffer cache is basically determined by temporal locality of accessed blocks [12], we propose an approximate LRU stack to efficiently track recency of requested blocks and use it as a measure in the feature vector.…”
Section: Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the so-called black-box method treats the storage system as a black box without knowing the internal algorithms or components and can accommodate workloads of different characteristics. In this method, the training data sets, which contain quantified description of characteristics of input I/O requests and their corresponding response times from the system, are recorded in a table [8] and fed into a machine learning model [9], [10], or a statistic model [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, some researchers using Petri nets model performance study. Wang [31] of Carnegie Mellon University present a CART models, it treats the storage system as a black box, and get the performance of system by the machine learning method. In the early years of the study and evaluating performance, people measure performance in view of specific components or technical provinces, such as disk array, server, SCSI bus, RAID, etc.…”
Section: Performance Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such as, SMART(Storage Management Analytics and Reasoning Technology), the storage management project of IBM Almaden Research Center; HP's AUTORAID [4], and so on. They mainly use rule-based, model-based or feedback-approach-based to realize decisionmaking and automation of storage systems [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%