1981
DOI: 10.23986/afsci.72070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage fungi of cabbage and their control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this case a microscope is needed for identifying the fungus. These results support the earlier study (TAHVONEN 1981) that the B. cinerea content remains fairly constant throughout the whole storage period, i.e. there is no appereciable spread of the fungus from infected to healthy cabbages during the storage period.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, in this case a microscope is needed for identifying the fungus. These results support the earlier study (TAHVONEN 1981) that the B. cinerea content remains fairly constant throughout the whole storage period, i.e. there is no appereciable spread of the fungus from infected to healthy cabbages during the storage period.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The storage losses for cabbages with a B. cinerea content of 90 % were already 0.34 %/day during a storage period of 6.5 months. As the damage caused by the fungus in the main does not develop until after 4 months storage (TAHVONEN 1981), the information provided by parallel storage about the storagability of the cabbage crop can be easily utilized when deciding the best time for marketing the cabbages. One disadvantage in this study was that no observations were obtained about B. cinerea contents over the range 40-80 %, which would have been essential for determining the more important damage threshold values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations