Storage Systems*

Thomasian, Alexander

doi:10.1201/b16812-23

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 61 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Flash memories can sustain a finite number of program/erase cycles, i.e., there is wearout due to repeated writing to the same location and writing is only possible to areas which have been preerased. Specialized erasure codes have been developed to deal with localized errors in SSDs [111].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mirrored and hybrid disk arrays and their reliability

Thomasian¹

2018

Cluster Comput

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Basic mirroring (BM) classified as RAID level 1 replicates data on two disks, thus doubling disk access bandwidth for read requests. RAID1/0 is an array of BM pairs with balanced loads due to striping. When a disk fails the read load on its pair is doubled, which results in halving the maximum attainable bandwidth. We review RAID1 organizations which attain a balanced load upon disk failure, but as shown by reliability analysis tend to be less reliable than RAID1/0. Hybrid disk arrays which store XORed instead of replicated data tend to have a higher reliability than mirrored disks, but incur a higher overhead in updating data. Read request response time can be improved by processing them at a higher priority than writes, since they have a direct effect on application response time. Shortest seek distance and affinity based routing both shorten seek time. Anticipatory arm placement places arms optimally to minimize the seek distance. The analysis of RAID1 in normal, degraded, and rebuild mode is provided to quantify RAID1/0 performance. We compare the reliability of mirrored disk organizations against each other and hybrid disks and erasure coded disk arrays. RAID reliabilities can be compared with a shortcut reliability analysis method.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%