2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2006.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage, Transmission, and Retrieval of Digital Mammography, Including Recommendations on Image Compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of the current digital revolution, traditional film-based hospitals are converting to digital hospitals, where patient medical records, chart information, and test results are easily available electronically for physicians from anywhere in the hospital and beyond. As such, full-digital mammography is gaining importance compared to conventional film-screen mammography due to the possibility of separating and individually optimising digital acquisition, digital storage, and digital display [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence of the current digital revolution, traditional film-based hospitals are converting to digital hospitals, where patient medical records, chart information, and test results are easily available electronically for physicians from anywhere in the hospital and beyond. As such, full-digital mammography is gaining importance compared to conventional film-screen mammography due to the possibility of separating and individually optimising digital acquisition, digital storage, and digital display [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ratios typically range from 1.5 to 3:1, and so only moderate savings in storage space are realized. Lossy compression ratios higher than 3 or 4:1 are currently not recommended, mainly due to concerns about the possible inability to evaluate subtle calcifications at these higher ratios (21). To date, several studies have shown that compression ratios far higher (as far as 80:1) might not result in loss of diagnostic information (22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Storage Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is based on a review of the clinical and physics literature on digital mammography and the experience of experts and publications from the Image Quality Collaborative Workgroup [1][2][3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%