2018
DOI: 10.1029/2017jc013708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storm Impact on Morphological Evolution of a Sandy Inlet

Abstract: Observations of waves, currents, and bathymetric change in shallow water (<10‐m depth) both inside and offshore of a migrating inlet with strong (2–3 m/s) tidal currents and complex nearshore bathymetry show over 2.5 m of erosion and accretion resulting from each of two hurricanes (offshore wave heights >8 m). A numerical model (Delft3D, 2DH mode) simulating waves, currents, and morphological change reproduces the observations with the inclusion of hurricane force winds and sediment transport parameters adjust… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biggest changes (Figure 4c) happened after extreme storm events, for instance, the unusual storm event of 1 February 2014 with PSI = 18,279 m 2 .h ( Table 1). These results are consistent with other observational and modeling studies under storm conditions (e.g., in [3,50] and references therein). The maximum tidal current velocity values at Figueira da Foz inlet ranged from 0.8 to 1.2 m.s -1 for spring tides and from 0.4 to 0.7 m.s -1 for neap tides [51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The biggest changes (Figure 4c) happened after extreme storm events, for instance, the unusual storm event of 1 February 2014 with PSI = 18,279 m 2 .h ( Table 1). These results are consistent with other observational and modeling studies under storm conditions (e.g., in [3,50] and references therein). The maximum tidal current velocity values at Figueira da Foz inlet ranged from 0.8 to 1.2 m.s -1 for spring tides and from 0.4 to 0.7 m.s -1 for neap tides [51].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Process-based coastal area models have the potential to provide comprehensive information at multiple spatio-temporal scales allowing more detailed evaluation. To date such coastal morphodynamic models are generally able to adequately simulate morphological change due to concurrent tides, waves and currents for short to medium-term time scales; events of 3-4 years [10][11][12][13]. Prediction of the long-term dynamics of sandy interventions have however remained a major challenge for process-based models [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delft3D consists of Flow, Wave, and Morphology modules that can be coupled to simulate the processes of fluvial‐tidal‐wave hydrodynamics, sediment transport, and morphological changes (for details see Text S1 in Supporting Information ). It has been applied and validated in various environments (estuaries, coastal waters, inland rivers) over a wide range of timescales, such as long‐term, centennial, decadal, sub‐decadal, annual, sub‐annual, seasonal and event scales (e.g., Gelfenbaum et al., 2015; Hibma et al., 2003; Hopkins et al., 2018; Lesser et al., 2004; Luan et al., 2017; Luijendijk et al, 2017; Meselhe et al., 2016; van der Wegen & Roelvink, 2008; van der Wegen et al., 2008, van der Wegen, Jaffe, & Roelvink, 2011; G. Wu et al., 2023; Zhu & Wiberg, 2022; Zhu et al., 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%