2014
DOI: 10.1002/2014ja019832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storm time response of the midlatitude thermosphere: Observations from a network of Fabry‐Perot interferometers

Abstract: Observations of thermospheric neutral winds and temperatures obtained during a geomagnetic storm on 2 October 2013 from a network of six Fabry‐Perot interferometers (FPIs) deployed in the Midwest United States are presented. Coincident with the commencement of the storm, the apparent horizontal wind is observed to surge westward and southward (toward the equator). Simultaneous to this surge in the apparent horizontal winds, an apparent downward wind of approximately 100 m/s lasting for 6 h is observed. The app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the event presented in this study, the FPIs made cardinal mode measurements, allowing estimates of the thermospheric zonal, meridional, and vertical winds. However, it should be noted that in a previous study of the NATION FPI observations from this storm period, Makela et al [] concluded that observations made to the zenith by each NATION FPI indicated the presence of an anomalously large and persistent downward Doppler shift of the thermospheric redline emission resulting in downward apparent vertical winds of the order of 100–140 m/s (Figure f). That study hypothesized that this was evidence for a contamination of this emission due to downward moving hot O atoms, and therefore, the inferred velocities are not completely indicative of the background thermospheric motion.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For the event presented in this study, the FPIs made cardinal mode measurements, allowing estimates of the thermospheric zonal, meridional, and vertical winds. However, it should be noted that in a previous study of the NATION FPI observations from this storm period, Makela et al [] concluded that observations made to the zenith by each NATION FPI indicated the presence of an anomalously large and persistent downward Doppler shift of the thermospheric redline emission resulting in downward apparent vertical winds of the order of 100–140 m/s (Figure f). That study hypothesized that this was evidence for a contamination of this emission due to downward moving hot O atoms, and therefore, the inferred velocities are not completely indicative of the background thermospheric motion.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, deviations from hydrostatic balance are short‐lived and cannot explain the large winds lasting more than an hour reported in some studies. Recently, Makela et al [] observed 100 m/s apparent downward winds sustained for several hours during the 2 October 2013 geomagnetic storm at midlatitudes. This downward wind was observed by six independent FPIs spanning 10° in latitude and longitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This downward wind was observed by six independent FPIs spanning 10° in latitude and longitude. Makela et al [] concluded that these large apparent vertical winds must be an artifact of some type of contamination and hypothesized that the source of contamination is energetic precipitating oxygen ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, networks of spatially separated FPIs with overlapping fields of view have been developed, which can provide information regarding the spatial distribution of the wind, as well as its temporal evolution [ Meriwether , ]. Examples of such networks include an SDI and FPI in Antarctica [ Anderson et al , ], two SDIs in Alaska [ Anderson et al , ], three FPIs in Peru, one of which is located in Arequipa and described by Meriwether et al [], three FPIs in Scandinavia [ Aruliah et al , ], two FPIs in Brazil [ Makela et al , ], and five FPIs in the eastern United States [ Makela et al , ]. The recent growth of these networks has motivated a need to develop a technique that combines measurements from multiple FPIs in order to estimate the regional thermospheric wind field, i.e., the latitudinal and longitudinal distribution of the three‐dimensional wind vector, which has zonal, meridional, and vertical components, and which is assumed to be representative of the wind at an altitude of 250 km.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%