2007
DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v32i1.5240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stormwater quality calibration by SWMM: A case study in Northern Spain

Abstract: This article presents an application of the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) in order to predict the pollution in rainy weather in a combined sewer system catchment in Santander, Spain. Suspended solids (SS), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) were measured at the exit of the catchment and these parameters were used for the calibration and validation of the model. The process of hydraulic and quality calibration is described and the values of the adjusted parameters are presented… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
52
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The Horton equation was used for infiltration modeling. Values adopted are in accordance with soil characteristics and with those proposed in the literature [21,22]. The maximum infiltration, f0, is around 20 mm/h, while the minimum infiltration, fc, is 1 mm/h.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Horton equation was used for infiltration modeling. Values adopted are in accordance with soil characteristics and with those proposed in the literature [21,22]. The maximum infiltration, f0, is around 20 mm/h, while the minimum infiltration, fc, is 1 mm/h.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The Manning's roughness coefficients for pervious and impervious areas were used as calibration parameters of the model. Initial values were selected from the literature [21,22]: 0.02-0.045 for pervious areas and 0.01-0.015 for impervious areas. The Manning roughness coefficient for conduits varies from 0.011 to 0.013 depending on the pipe material.…”
Section: Hydraulic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As mentioned previously, SWMM model outputs are sensitive to hydraulic width, imperviousness and depression storage depth [34,60], the first two parameters being positively correlated to peak flow, the latter, negatively correlated. Calibration of the Difficult Run watershed model was conducted by varying hydraulic width (the sub-catchment area divided by the maximum overland flow length), imperviousness and depression storage depth (a depth that must be filled prior to the runoff occurs) for 2010 data.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The delineation and modelling of urban catchments is a widely addressed topic in literature, which provides multiple evidence of the capability of GIS and stormwater models to reproduce their hydrological response with accuracy [21][22][23]. Hence, the methodology presented in this study finds application in the next step to these tasks; i.e., in situations in which the stormwater modelling of urban catchments has been calibrated and validated and their simulation for design return periods leads to high peak runoff rates in the subcatchments forming them and flooding in the nodes of their drainage networks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%