“…Challenging chemophobia requires a multifaceted approach, including critical thinking and scientific literacy; inclusive education, communications, and outreach; and policy change for greater social justice in society. As Arday, Bhambra, and others have articulated, critical thinking is a tool of decolonization; hence, the methods to develop these skills must themselves be inclusive, decolonized, and relevant to their context. − - In activities aiming to develop chemical literacy and/or critical thinking, widen the scope beyond purely chemical considerations to consider ethical and social aspects of the topic ,
- e.g., when considering power generation, aspects such as waste disposal, efficiency, changes in demand, and environmental impact could all be considered
- Facilitate nonjudgmental discussions around chemophobia, critical thinking, and alternative conceptions, where all learners are able to engage and participate ,
- A key aspect of this is to embed teaching scientists and STEMM students about inequities in science and wider society −
- Use real-world issues as starting points for critical and curious conversations–consider asking what, or who, is missing from the discussion
- We value the approach taken by Lynda Dunlop and colleagues in amplifying youth voices in the context of climate crisis ,
- If you are conducting research or outreach, consider co-research or participatory research methods, collaborating with colleagues or advisors who have relevant lived experience ,
- e.g., if an outreach activity is aimed at disabled learners, consider conducting a focus group with disabled students to discuss how the activity can be accessible, engaging, and relevant
…”