Recent syntheses of Cordillera tectonics contain contradictory views of subduction polarity in the late Mesozoic, and this contradiction has implications for whole-earth processes. The long-held view of eastdipping subduction throughout the Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous Cordillera is challenged by tectonic models calling on a west-dipping subduction system that led to the collision of oceanic arcs, ribboncontinents, or both, with North America. Evidence in support of these models are seismic anomalies in the deep mantle inferred to represent subducted lithosphere from a west-dipping slab. We argue that this "bottom-up" approach to tectonic synthesis carries assumptions that are as great as or greater than ambiguities from the "topdown" approach of surface geology. Geologic evidence from the northern Cordillera is inconsistent with west-dipping subduction in Jura-Cretaceous time and requires long-lived east-dipping subduction along much of the Cordilleran margin. West-dipping subduction in Triassic-Early Jurassic time has been documented and may be the source of the seismic anomalies. We encourage the broader community to come to consensus on integration of these deep images with surface geology. FUNDAMENTAL CONTROVERSY OF SUBDUCTION POLARITY Uncertainties regarding the late Mesozoic evolution of the Cordilleran margin focus primarily on (1) the size of the ocean basin separating the Wrangellia composite terrane (WCT) or Insular superterrane from the continental margin; and (2) the location, polarity, and age of subduction zones that closed this basin (Fig. 1). One set of models, mainly based on geologic observations, shares an interpretation that this basin closed during Jura-Cretaceous time along an east-dipping 1 subduction zone built along the continental margin,