In this article, we examine how leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (LDS or LDS Church) responded to the emergence of homosexuality as a prominent social issue by engaging in "oppressive othering" (Schwalbe et al. 2000), which refers to the process whereby elites classify members of other groups as morally inferior. On the basis of LDS archival materials, we analyze how LDS elites accomplished "oppressive othering" by constructing sexual classification schemes defining homosexuality as the result of (1) familial, (2) gendered, and (3) sexual dysfunctions. In conclusion, we draw out implications for understanding (1) how elites, religious, or otherwise, construct sexual classification schemes that facilitate the ongoing subordination of sexual minorities, (2) the importance of taking an intersectional approach to oppressive othering, and (3) the ways elites revise institutional doctrines in response to shifting societal issues and concerns.The establishment and maintenance of mutually exclusive classifications are central to organized religion (see e.g., Berger 1967; Weber 1922). Religious institutions have rich histories of establishing and enforcing divinely inspired distinctions between, for example, acceptable and unacceptable practices, sacred and secular worlds, earthly and eternal desires, and moral and immoral people. Religious leaders seem to understand the importance of categorizing all aspects of social life for their followers. Since people act toward things based on the meanings those things have for them (see