2017
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b09163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Straightforward Loading of Imidazole Molecules into Metal–Organic Framework for High Proton Conduction

Abstract: A one-step straightforward strategy has been developed to incorporate free imidazole molecules into a highly stable metal-organic framework (NENU-3, ([Cu(BTC)(HO)][HPWO])·Guest). The resulting material Im@(NENU-3) exhibits a very high proton conductivity of 1.82 × 10 S cm at 90% RH and 70 °C, which is significantly higher than 3.16 × 10 S cm for Im-Cu@(NENU-3a) synthesized through a two-step approach with mainly terminal bound imidazole molecules inside pores. Single crystal structure reveals that imidazole mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
176
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
176
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However,s ome peaks from 9.5 to 258 slightly shift towardlower anglesc ompared with the simulated ones, which showsa ne xpansion of the lattice after absorption of water molecules. Thus, it leads to the optimized protonconductivity for 1 of 1.50 10 À3 Scm À1 .A sl isted in Ta ble 2, althought he optimized conductivity value is smaller than that of severalr ecent MOFs, [38][39][40][41] this value can be compared to that of some previousM OFs under similar tested conditions, [41][42][43][44][45][46] and is remarkably highert han that of four imidazole dicarboxylate-based Co II MOFs and other MOFs. [27,28,47] It is illustrated again that the structural advantage of MOF 1 is the a large amount of uncoordinated carboxylate units between the layers forprotontransfer.…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However,s ome peaks from 9.5 to 258 slightly shift towardlower anglesc ompared with the simulated ones, which showsa ne xpansion of the lattice after absorption of water molecules. Thus, it leads to the optimized protonconductivity for 1 of 1.50 10 À3 Scm À1 .A sl isted in Ta ble 2, althought he optimized conductivity value is smaller than that of severalr ecent MOFs, [38][39][40][41] this value can be compared to that of some previousM OFs under similar tested conditions, [41][42][43][44][45][46] and is remarkably highert han that of four imidazole dicarboxylate-based Co II MOFs and other MOFs. [27,28,47] It is illustrated again that the structural advantage of MOF 1 is the a large amount of uncoordinated carboxylate units between the layers forprotontransfer.…”
Section: As Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…By applying this strategy, Zhang and Chen et al. showed a simple and straightforward approach to install a high density of free imidazoles into the pores of an ultra‐stable MOF (NENU‐3, [[Cu 12 (BTC) 8 (H 2 O) 12 ] [HPW 12 O 40 ]) ⋅ host) . Imidazole molecules in activated NENU‐3, Im‐Cu(NENU‐3a) (synthesized in a two‐step process), isolate coordinated water molecules from the framework and thus block the proton‐transport pathways, as demonstrated by single‐crystal diffraction measurement studies.…”
Section: Intoductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ O 40 ])·host). [17] Imidazole molecules in activatedN ENU-3, Im-Cu(NENU-3a) (synthesized in at wo-step process), isolate coordinated water molecules from the framework and thus block the proton-transport pathways, as demonstrated by single-crystal diffraction measurement studies. On the other hand, the high density of free imidazole molecules within Im@(NENU-3) (synthesized in as imple one-step process) significantly facilitatess ubsequent proton-jump pathways throught he formation of hydrogen bonds.…”
Section: Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations