WKHA rats constitute a recombinant inbred rat strain derived by phenotypic selection of the progeny of hybrid F2 crosses between SHR and WKY rats. WKHA are normotensive and show some features of hyperactivity and of hyper-reactivity to stress, but their utility as model of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has not yetWistar-Kyoto-derived Hyperactive (WKHA) rats constitute an inbred strain that has been derived from the progeny of hybrid Wistar-Kyoto (WKY)/ Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats (SHR) F2 crosses. The WKHA rats were developed initially in 1980 by Hendley and associates in the attempt to remove a prominent behavioral abnormality (hyperactivity) from the hypertensive trait of SHR that had been fixed in this strain during intensive inbreeding (Hendley and Ohlsson 1991;Hendley 2000). Using cross-breeding of SHR with WKY followed by recombinant selected inbreeding, Hendley and Ohlsson (1991) (Deschepper et al. 1997). WKHA display marked locomotor hyperactivity and hyperreactivity to stress when compared with WKY. The activity score obtained with WKHA in an exploration test in a novel environment is much higher than the score observed in the WKY strain (Sagvolden et al. 1992). Moreover, the WKHA also seems to display "attentional problems" when compared with WKY (Sagvolden et al. 1992). Although these characteristics are reminiscent of those observed in children diagnosed with attention deficit disorder (ADHD), the utility of this strain as a potential model of ADHD has not received extensive experimental attention.Accordingly, the present study was conducted to assess the face validity of the WKHA strain as a model of ADHD. To do so, we compared the performance of WKHA to both WKY (genetic control) and Wistar (outbred control) strains in two behavioral tests. First, we measured activity levels of the three strains in an exploration test in a novel environment. Second, we examined the behavior of the three strains in the prepulse inhibition (PPI) test of the acoustic startle reflex. This test assesses sensorimotor gating, or the extent to which a weak acoustic stimulus draws cognitive processing away from a more pronounced acoustic stimulus (Ralph et al. 1999;Wood et al. 1998). Although there is considerable debate as to whether PPI reflects the operation of an attentional (as opposed to a preattentional) mechanism, it is clear that PPI is involved in stimulus selection or stimulus filtering, a process that appears to be aberrant in ADHD (Ralph et al. 1999). Moreover, some evidence also exists for a deficit in sensorimotor gating in a sub-population of ADHD children (Castellanos et al. 1996). A third reason justifying our use of the PPI test is that, like locomotor activity, sensorimotor gating is modulated by central dopaminergic substrates (Swerdlow et al. 1994), and there is extensive clinical evidence implicating alterations in dopaminergic function in the pathophysiology of ADHD (Pliszka et al. 1996).We also examined the extent to which the performances of the three strains in both the locom...