2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.comptc.2012.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain energy in enzyme–substrate binding: An energetic insight into the flexibility versus rigidity of enzyme active site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is usually interpreted as the blueprint of an optimal structural compactness at the active site, where reaction partners are kept tight in the optimal geometry that underlies the catalytically competent atomic arrangement. This fact perfectly rhymes with the known reports that active sites tend to lie in the stiffest regions of enzyme structures 3537 and that a subtle balance of rigidity and some specific flexibility are implied in enzyme catalysis 38,39 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is usually interpreted as the blueprint of an optimal structural compactness at the active site, where reaction partners are kept tight in the optimal geometry that underlies the catalytically competent atomic arrangement. This fact perfectly rhymes with the known reports that active sites tend to lie in the stiffest regions of enzyme structures 3537 and that a subtle balance of rigidity and some specific flexibility are implied in enzyme catalysis 38,39 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Here, the strain energy was calculated to range from 8.7 to 21.8 kcal/mol, which is larger than those of strain energies involved in routine enzyme–ligand interactions (<10 kcal/mol). [ 21 ] Although the strain energy is not very high as compared to those accounted for solvent effect and, more significantly, noncovalent interaction, it should not be ignored if considering that the total binding energy of EGFR–inhibitor complex systems is just about −9 kcal/mol, which is at the same level of the strain energy. Interestingly, it is evident from Figure 3a that the curves of solvent effect and interaction energy exhibit a complementary profile over the 11 inhibitor samples, that is, the stronger the interaction energy is, the more the solvent penalty should be paid, and vice versa.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was previously assumed that substrate specificity of an enzyme is determined by stereo-chemical complementarities with its active site [ 36 - 39 ]; however, these preferences are not stringent enough. It has since been found that, in addition to substrate target site preferences, many protein kinases uses dedicated modular protein-protein interaction docking domains, interactions involving binding of the surface of the catalytic domain, but distinct from catalytic active sites [ 40 - 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%