2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-019-1151-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain Hardening and Strain-Rate Effect in Friction Between Projectile and Barrel During Engraving Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After substituting Equation (15) into Equation ( 11 F I G U R E 13 Comparison between simulation data and the fitting curve of engraving resistance. (1) The projectile engraving process takes approximately 3.8 ms, accounting for 26% of the whole launch process; the projectile velocity is 143.54 m/s at the end of the engraving process, reaching 15.2% of the muzzle velocity of 925.13 m/s; the chamber mean pressure at the end of the engraving process is 264.96 MPa, which is 85.4% of the maximum chamber mean pressure of 310.24 MPa.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Two Interior Ballistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After substituting Equation (15) into Equation ( 11 F I G U R E 13 Comparison between simulation data and the fitting curve of engraving resistance. (1) The projectile engraving process takes approximately 3.8 ms, accounting for 26% of the whole launch process; the projectile velocity is 143.54 m/s at the end of the engraving process, reaching 15.2% of the muzzle velocity of 925.13 m/s; the chamber mean pressure at the end of the engraving process is 264.96 MPa, which is 85.4% of the maximum chamber mean pressure of 310.24 MPa.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Two Interior Ballistic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gradually, researchers have shifted their research focus to projectile engraving tests. For example, quasi-static push tests were carried out using an electrohydraulic servo universal testing machine, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and dynamic push tests were carried out using an impact testing machine 16,17 or a self-developed simulation experiment device based on a truncated gun barrel. [12][13][14][15][18][19][20] Also, a horizontal milling machine and a specially shaped tool were used to recreate the process when a rotating band impacts rifling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through the comparison of experimental and numerical results, it was concluded that Johnson-Cook constitutive Model combined with failure model and h-adaptive algorithm was the most suitable method for predicting the axial fracture of EFP. Wu [10][11] used the truncated barrel, hydraulic system and gas gun to simulate the quasi-static and transient engraving process, respectively. by measuring and analyzing the circunferential strain of the outer surface of the barrel during the engraving process and the observing the surface morphology of the copper after the groove, the results show that the strain hardening at low loading speed and the strain rate effect and thermal effect at high loading speed play a key role in the engraving process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing researches have shown that excessive wear of the chamber throat is one of the key factors limiting barrel life [12][13][14]. In the dynamic engraving process, the projectile imposes an impact load on the barrel, accompanied by high-speed friction, resulting in the adhesive wear and secondary abrasive wear [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%