2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain-induced magnetic anisotropy via the Jahn-Teller effect and the magnetoelastic coupling of tetragonally distorted (Cu,Co)Fe2O4 particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into consideration intergranular exchange coupling gives very good agreement with the experimental data. For this tetragonally distorted sample, the anisotropy field H A ≈ 1.9 MA m −1 is derived from the parameters M s = 0.158 × 10 6 A m −1 and K = 0.19 × 10 6 J m −3 at 300 K. This value is in fair agreement with the room temperature anisotropy field estimated via the rotational hysteresis and inverse applied field, W r vs 1/H plot from room temperature torque measurements (H A torq ≈ 1.6 MA m −1 ) [11]. The experimental M(H) curves were measured in the range 3-300 K and the fitting parameters obtained from the M(H app ) analysis are plotted as a function of temperature in figure 2(b).…”
Section: Calculation Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Taking into consideration intergranular exchange coupling gives very good agreement with the experimental data. For this tetragonally distorted sample, the anisotropy field H A ≈ 1.9 MA m −1 is derived from the parameters M s = 0.158 × 10 6 A m −1 and K = 0.19 × 10 6 J m −3 at 300 K. This value is in fair agreement with the room temperature anisotropy field estimated via the rotational hysteresis and inverse applied field, W r vs 1/H plot from room temperature torque measurements (H A torq ≈ 1.6 MA m −1 ) [11]. The experimental M(H) curves were measured in the range 3-300 K and the fitting parameters obtained from the M(H app ) analysis are plotted as a function of temperature in figure 2(b).…”
Section: Calculation Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Two samples of Co x Cu 1−x Fe 2 O 4 particles where x = 0.1 and x = 0.2 were prepared via coprecipitation and flux methods, as detailed in [11]. Analysis of x-ray diffraction patterns showed that the x = 0.1 sample consists of a single phase tetragonal structure with distinct JT distortion (c/a > 1), whereas the x = 0.2 sample consists of a single phase cubic structure with no distinct global JT distortion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations