1978
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.18.5887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Strain interactions and the low-temperature properties of glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most promising ideas involve the role of interactions between TLS, which had been ignored in the Tunneling Model. Soon after it was reported that amorphous solids appear to have very similar anomalous thermal properties at low temperatures, 8 Klein et al 9 speculated that strain-mediated interactions between the tunneling entities could be responsible for this similarity. By comparing many amorphous solids, Freeman and Anderson 10 found that the tunneling strength Cϭ P ␥ 2 /v 2 rather than the spectral density P was the quantity that varied least between amorphous solids (␥-coupling of TLS to phonons; -mass density; v-speed of sound͒, as had been noted previously by Hunklinger et al 11 Freeman and Anderson argued that the universality of this combination of parameters was an indication of the role of strain-mediated interactions between TLS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most promising ideas involve the role of interactions between TLS, which had been ignored in the Tunneling Model. Soon after it was reported that amorphous solids appear to have very similar anomalous thermal properties at low temperatures, 8 Klein et al 9 speculated that strain-mediated interactions between the tunneling entities could be responsible for this similarity. By comparing many amorphous solids, Freeman and Anderson 10 found that the tunneling strength Cϭ P ␥ 2 /v 2 rather than the spectral density P was the quantity that varied least between amorphous solids (␥-coupling of TLS to phonons; -mass density; v-speed of sound͒, as had been noted previously by Hunklinger et al 11 Freeman and Anderson argued that the universality of this combination of parameters was an indication of the role of strain-mediated interactions between TLS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let the positions of the particles in the two wells be left ( L ) and right ( R ). The tunneling particles in the cluster interact via a weak potential U which may have its origin, for example, from either a strain-strain interaction having the form U ~ A / r 3 (dipole-dipole interaction) [29, 68], where r is the distance between a pair of tunneling particles either in the L or R well and A is a constant, or it could be due to electrostatic dipole-dipole interaction. The tunneling of the particle in one 2LS from L to R (or vice versa) influences, via the interaction, the particle in the other 2LS, forcing it to jump into the free well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be taken as evidence that random stresses alone cannot lead to a saturation of the tunneling strength within the universal range, and that another mechanism is needed, e.g. interaction between the CN Ϫ quadrupoles, as has been discussed by Sethna and Chow, 43 based on quadrupolar interactions first suggested by Klein et al 10 For the saturation of the tunneling strength in FIG. 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%